From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id EAFE13858D28; Wed, 15 Feb 2023 17:00:10 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org EAFE13858D28 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1676480410; bh=FbPOjMVNQ3eHkdnc3lPL4fsgCPtYG5uC22PJMDG4xXg=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=a0kI82S1A3Zm6IGqcfTTgNai9Bt+XyyBuTI0LlbPuFh7L7aDS0liQDiBtYjG6qDsq cxSmy1Lxs2j44Gl86RDYdvRB03OyAOUUFklLZqk1Rh9/qDsnODiQDS20v1ntFYaJAt 74xwv1+Afz4+pHhw/G0OAWT0mpSHigmj2AGkkCw0= From: "dcb314 at hotmail dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c/108718] [10/11/12/13 Regression] csmith: possible bad code with -O2 Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2023 17:00:10 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: dcb314 at hotmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 10.5 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D108718 --- Comment #11 from David Binderman --- (In reply to Martin Li=C5=A1ka from comment #10) > However, I see a segfault that happens for the code snippet now. In the compiler or the generated code ? No crashes here. Are you running an asan+ubsan gcc build on x86_64, perhaps= ?=