From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 0EC593858281; Thu, 16 Feb 2023 12:59:46 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 0EC593858281
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1676552387;
	bh=Zq/GgZQzzqmbRKzoPBbRM90CIhW6/6y7fJBpB9z+tuo=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=ByqcxZ5VHmI+t+9DC1glSm4wN/LpbTRJghHzHG8U2OPmGq5MtFDBic6mDvSzU2ZSI
	 4fQGjgxzCxQnkxxCJA8lw0vWuJKBPeyD9NrgudxJjNm2d8wjVX+6r2U39Qr40i8A0G
	 bVTB9c7NFWp7wAUCmJplmSVz7jtaZlp0e/uH+LbA=
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/108718] [10/11/12/13 Regression] csmith: possible bad code
 with -O2
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2023 12:59:46 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: INVALID
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 10.5
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution
Message-ID: <bug-108718-4-FT6qhNdo6a@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-108718-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-108718-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D108718

Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |INVALID

--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Martin Li=C5=A1ka from comment #10)
> (In reply to David Binderman from comment #9)
> > Created attachment 54463 [details]
> > C source code
> >=20
> > After a further hour of reduction, a partially reduced program.
> >=20
> > cvise doesn't seem able to make much further progress with it.
>=20
> However, I see a segfault that happens for the code snippet now.

The reduced testcase has various flaws, i uninitialized at the start of fir=
st
loop in main, and the last loop in main iterating endlessly, main_j < 10 sh=
ould
be probably the condition of the for loop.
Anyway, I think there are aliasing violations again,
*g_45 =3D &g_5[2][5];
is (implicitly) int while g_5[2][5] has type union { short } and e.g. func_=
13
stores
it through that g_45 pointer (so writes over g_5[2][5].f4 and g_5[2][6].f4,
that itself is an aliasing violation, and then reads/writes g_5[2][5].f4
through short * pointer in
((--*l_701));
The original testcase has that too:
union U0 {
   uint64_t f0;
   int32_t f1;
   uint64_t f2;
   int32_t f3;
   uint16_t f4;
};
static union U0 g_5[5][10] =3D
{{{1UL},{18446744073709551610UL},{0x998AB5457D670012LL},{184467440737095516=
12UL},{0x998AB5457D670012LL},{18446744073709551610UL},{1UL},{1UL},{18446744=
073709551615UL},{18446744073709551607UL}},{{1UL},{6UL},{0x7F6FB807CFAF425FL=
L},{0UL},{1UL},{1UL},{0UL},{0x7F6FB807CFAF425FLL},{6UL},{1UL}},{{0xF996F377=
CC424770LL},{6UL},{18446744073709551615UL},{0xF0488F4F368A9017LL},{18446744=
073709551612UL},{18446744073709551607UL},{1UL},{18446744073709551607UL},{18=
446744073709551612UL},{0xF0488F4F368A9017LL}},{{0xF0488F4F368A9017LL},{1844=
6744073709551610UL},{0xF0488F4F368A9017LL},{6UL},{18446744073709551612UL},{=
3UL},{1UL},{0x998AB5457D670012LL},{0x998AB5457D670012LL},{1UL}},{{184467440=
73709551612UL},{1UL},{3UL},{3UL},{1UL},{18446744073709551612UL},{6UL},{1UL}=
,{18446744073709551612UL},{18446744073709551615UL}}};
static int32_t *g_45 =3D &g_5[2][5].f3;
and in func_13
    uint16_t *l_701 =3D &g_5[2][5].f4;
...
            (*g_45) |=3D (*g_90);
...
--(*l_701)
on the penultimate line in func_13 among other things.  Though, (*g_45) |=3D
(*g_90);
actually isn't reached.
But, just setting awatch in -g -O0 compiled #c0, I can see it again doing U=
B,
e.g. func_26 does:
            l_169[3][4] =3D (*g_45);
            (*p_27) |=3D (safe_sub_func_int32_t_s_s(0x191EB41DL, p_29.f0));
where both g_45 and p_27 point to &g_5[2][5].f3 with int * type, and then
func_18 does:
            return g_5[2][5].f4;
which reads it through union as unsigned short.=