From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 36DB13858C5F; Fri, 10 Feb 2023 11:00:25 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 36DB13858C5F DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1676026825; bh=DMgpl0jx6L2SIZuz/p10h1H1NDliFKcVqh+XcHaQ2Uw=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=tZBrbKFPUuAc1pZkJmbGC2FTZEBzMMCifTSIJDKNZzBEuXQphqiSqQP5qbQseZ41N HUGwOPWxw8B34h74lroqcSsjrJ5w8DcXV80ddDxxh7/X5qX/8zPfO0rHpN3+UIrSXD qKdXMlWLNZieJIcPVJN5Vz497QCp/ej8a/VXPSEw= From: "burnus at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug other/108749] [OpenMP][C/C++/Fortran] inscan reduction modifier rejected for combined/composite constructs of simd/for/do Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2023 11:00:24 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: other X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: openmp, rejects-valid X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: burnus at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D108749 --- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2) > Actually, I don't see how inscan be implemented on taskloop The proposed extension of the restriction is now tracked in the OpenMP specification Issue 3489.=