public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/108757] We do not simplify (a - (N*M)) / N + M -> a / N
Date: Thu, 11 May 2023 17:32:29 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-108757-4-o1M2YtPADe@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-108757-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108757
--- Comment #21 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Jiu Fu Guo from comment #20)
> Interesting thing:
> the VR is always VR_VARYING, even for the below simple case:
>
> typedef unsigned long INT;
> INT __attribute__ ((noinline)) foo (INT x)
> {
> if (x < 4)
> return 0;
> INT a = x + 18446744073709551612ULL;
> INT b = a >> 2;
> return b + 1;
> }
Yes that is because x does not have a "global" range.
You could try the following testcase:
```
typedef unsigned long INT;
INT __attribute__ ((noinline)) foo (INT x)
{
if (x < 4)
__builtin_unreachable();
INT a = x + 18446744073709551612ULL;
INT b = a >> 2;
return b + 1;
}
```
Which gets a (global) range for x_1(D) during forwprop3:
# RANGE [irange] INT [4, +INF]
INTD.2750 x_1(D) = xD.2751;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-11 17:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-10 22:26 [Bug tree-optimization/108757] New: " bergner at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-02-10 22:28 ` [Bug tree-optimization/108757] " bergner at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-02-10 22:33 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-02-10 22:40 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-02-11 13:14 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-02-11 16:38 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-02-11 17:32 ` bergner at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-02-11 17:55 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-02-11 18:05 ` bergner at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-02-11 18:15 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-02-11 19:45 ` chip.kerchner at ibm dot com
2023-02-11 21:55 ` chip.kerchner at ibm dot com
2023-02-11 22:03 ` chip.kerchner at ibm dot com
2023-02-13 20:13 ` chip.kerchner at ibm dot com
2023-02-13 20:20 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-02-13 20:27 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/108757] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-02-13 20:36 ` chip.kerchner at ibm dot com
2023-02-13 20:37 ` chip.kerchner at ibm dot com
2023-02-13 20:58 ` [Bug tree-optimization/108757] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-02-13 20:59 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-02-13 21:01 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-11 13:15 ` guojiufu at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-11 17:32 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2023-05-12 1:52 ` guojiufu at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-12 6:25 ` guojiufu at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-12 9:35 ` guojiufu at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-09-04 2:46 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-09-04 3:26 ` guojiufu at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-108757-4-o1M2YtPADe@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
--to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).