From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id EA31D3858288; Mon, 13 Feb 2023 17:20:15 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org EA31D3858288
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1676308815;
	bh=ljSJg5kqaUzgWMsOvKrhHUIk2INT6HH2lRNRMcw/yAw=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=xG92L/Cks1PdsV7bIGxUcmMgW8sPngbOUm3S9aqZpU33J1p2x+bTv/5u5YArwnfBA
	 MEGGKc1uxysUoZhsoDyYidZqaGyTZL7G98kRJ864rGrzStDY8/McH0hxPXh8Ua+B+p
	 7n8U0cJj+jOrthaFWem1z0uvmj4RQnYDdn8Py8b4=
From: "mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/108759] "mandatory copy elision" not implemented during
 constant evaluation redux
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2023 17:20:15 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: rejects-valid, wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cf_reconfirmed_on bug_status cc everconfirmed
Message-ID: <bug-108759-4-tgrDXAC9Ow@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-108759-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-108759-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D108759

Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2023-02-13
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
                 CC|                            |mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1

--- Comment #1 from Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Confirmed, we haven't elided the TARGET_EXPR:

*<retval> =3D TARGET_EXPR <D.2533, {.special=3D(const struct A *)
&<PLACEHOLDER_EXPR struct A> =3D=3D &a}>=