From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 558ED3857736; Fri,  8 Mar 2024 14:57:42 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 558ED3857736
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1709909862;
	bh=3L9i3uf8DKyqDFXTDoRj/oPpErC2Jg5bSJar95thqkE=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=C9ig79EX8A/HN9D0rm2AaJyjnqO+pyLHEeoW/zLUT3S1qzYCmO9W6aX4ZhekqIAj/
	 JKLJrsQQFajNolKi0wNN2kfGTRq4wGLQ+yJ+UdhWpE2WQnLDSpZLU4MbTGomnpEIGX
	 BLpK8avxt/+UW+2dy3brqda8wplKEzq10+QWciko=
From: "jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug ipa/108802] [11/12/13/14 Regression] missed inlining of call
 via pointer to member function
Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2024 14:57:40 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: ipa
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 11.5
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-108802-4-87GiNePzTP@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-108802-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-108802-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D108802

--- Comment #8 from Martin Jambor <jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I have proposed an improved patch on the mailing list:
https://inbox.sourceware.org/gcc-patches/ri6r0gkzvi4.fsf@virgil.suse.cz/T/#=
u=