From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id AE0F23857BB2; Thu, 16 Feb 2023 18:00:54 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org AE0F23857BB2
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1676570454;
	bh=P50uWeJm1DkVB9JZex2s70RR1v+TgvYSwapJtEvawaQ=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=m3AFe1A5s8Cy10mYKk2AITGeLDcXyWY1eTq+VyG7HE7XZQr0zmIyJ7pEQUK1PugCi
	 TZDN8GzTyiWkFyQI2bg+bpm6AraU76RNeHMQIFNlv0Bo51ZPmIUGMBzvPWBmOLYY0U
	 4K+LJhn2dy0MUFYBCkpm2nkHoAZQEhEKfvq7DSW8=
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/108803] [10/11/12/13 Regression] wrong code for 128bit
 rotate on aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu with -Og
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2023 18:00:54 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 10.5
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-108803-4-QjZbmJvqdi@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-108803-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-108803-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D108803

--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I take back the "I wonder why we haven't optimized it earlier", the reason =
is
-Og, we do optimize that in evrp/vrp*, but those aren't done with -Og.=