From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id B660E3858C2B; Sat, 15 Apr 2023 09:55:56 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org B660E3858C2B
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1681552556;
	bh=Gj7g24GQ5mjFV1Zd338WgGxmALAE6qnYN/5T5Q1PY5w=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=nCJpn0AhGKIYFo3QtPTc0SCPBrHUkZ1TEsRYSD0qUtRMYWd6IGy/NwEkK3XVwdsbL
	 rH5n9OMqtx9b5PZ01/igRE7k8gDwuYbJxzQrg9o9y59WnI065aUZycJf+HYoF7Lmu7
	 fPbsvSgdtaK+CZJqO1zjrfNyQ36aglgjbj2J6Dc0=
From: "linkw at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/108807] [11/12 regression]
 gcc.target/powerpc/vsx-builtin-10d.c fails after r11-6857-gb29225597584b6 on
 power 9 BE
Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2023 09:55:55 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.3.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: linkw at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: linkw at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 11.4
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-108807-4-I8hujH8JRR@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-108807-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-108807-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D108807

--- Comment #6 from Kewen Lin <linkw at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #5)
> Kewen, is this BZ fixed on the trunk?  If so we should update the title by
> dropping the "/13" so that's not flagged as a gcc-13 regression.

Yes, thanks for reminding and tips! I didn't know this rule before, I had a
related question that I'm going to backport the commit to gcc-11/gcc-12 soo=
n,
once it's done excepting for marking the status to resolved, should I also =
drop
the remaining "[11/12 regression]"? Or for a bug in resolved status, not
dropping it would be fine?=