From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 6FAB0385843E; Mon, 17 Apr 2023 02:39:40 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 6FAB0385843E DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1681699180; bh=nKBAqBPfvjc0AW3egAkLSvYoW4qKcrhHxFbHUiCw3Es=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=rNT3SVko7pgewtV8FTiVsSIFtb6adgs6N46tSiwQdcYFWv3u5ZqZrZfTV2NeQec3L BIzYzSU6IdFlg/a0QAtPjdti/7tF0tfM3SJ25ii9PIcGysPSh6mW+IP01Hro2rzi9I 91GkJ3G9kAr2IC38JqTLsYAmnj8WXTvCoCpUDfEA= From: "cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug testsuite/108809] gcc.target/powerpc/builtins-5-p9-runnable.c fails on power 9 BE Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2023 02:39:39 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: testsuite X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: guojiufu at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D108809 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jiu Fu Guo : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a1f25e04b8d10bbe5dcaf98bb7e17cdaec9f169d commit r13-7202-ga1f25e04b8d10bbe5dcaf98bb7e17cdaec9f169d Author: Jiufu Guo Date: Fri Apr 14 10:50:28 2023 +0800 testsuite: update builtins-5-p9-runnable.c for BE Hi, As PR108809 mentioned, vec_xl_len_r and vec_xst_len_r are tested in gcc.target/powerpc/builtins-5-p9-runnable.c. The vector operand of these two bifs are different from the view of v16_int8 between BE and LE, even it is same from the view of 128bits(uint128/V1TI). The test case gcc.target/powerpc/builtins-5-p9-runnable.c was written for LE environment, this patch updates it for BE. Tested on ppc64 BE and LE. Is this ok for trunk? BR, Jeff (Jiufu) gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: PR testsuite/108809 * gcc.target/powerpc/builtins-5-p9-runnable.c: Update for BE.=