From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id B0D9F3858C78; Fri, 17 Feb 2023 07:59:56 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org B0D9F3858C78 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1676620796; bh=CDfPkDZO+SrNCZ9LgibbrjB4gh4aDctvnSpoyEq2vOs=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=pjmaeXCO+4zHOh6CHbQFc+izlaFT+ogyNKS6pM8mtz+jkHamg9REH+LDSEYMHv2ye y49lV5mzfLXra7Ax3pvkJbTdiomZLYLVyfUptGUM2ukc4wvPSpSM+39xO0gEm5N/BW HYBS9WCtlIEaS5HjDVbcL5M78Mcld7+PSB3VeEAs= From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/108819] [12/13 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O1 with "-fno-tree-ccp -fno-tree-forwprop" on x86_64-linux-gnu: tree check: expected ssa_name, have integer_cst in number_of_iterations_cltz, at tree-ssa-loop-niter.cc:2394 Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2023 07:59:56 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 12.3 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status assigned_to priority Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D108819 Richard Biener changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot = gnu.org Priority|P3 |P2 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- Not exactly "wrong", but yes, passes don't expect this. I will have a look= .=