From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 7C9FB3858C78; Thu, 16 Feb 2023 12:53:17 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 7C9FB3858C78
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1676551997;
	bh=2xYdTqsByBBhXsZVMYWZ9A3IJSJKgVkFjsQ8gFTArYw=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=hIBp2YMnTsIplgVpn1fIKKVN2Oz5k2O+1m5kfAkvdQkDQttA7WWRZAWacY+/3M4uJ
	 Gczw8Ui4GituYThH420XUmDFkUnGdQ7k9vGEfkbYyOd6iTx2b+Wbi8IWfOQs3rvaDW
	 ntVzsmR1QiNCFKeX9iSTioQUrtgRH0EaHs6uuuyM=
From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libstdc++/108820] vector::resize(n, v) requires
 copy_assignable, which is not part of the CopyInsertable concept
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2023 12:53:17 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: redi at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: DUPLICATE
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution
Message-ID: <bug-108820-4-XdC7cVQhSY@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-108820-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-108820-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D108820

Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |DUPLICATE

--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Yes, this is exactly PR 106239 which I closed as a dup of PR 83981 because
they're both about LWG 2033.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 106239 ***=