From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id DB6573858D38; Sat, 18 Feb 2023 19:24:35 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org DB6573858D38 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1676748275; bh=5jE9NTV0urRFLsuT7/3mkJu5Khf5H5sTqOoK/ANqjXo=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:From; b=Dh7HxQP1rL2al2C6Sk+lV21kpr4xPjrBPxLl7nOJO5aJxtyh5Zzj4MdmBkkNSvzT/ WUhif3hmJqd1HkCrUC7Z1i5jmmIunYQVnaBqvYdcTttZor89iVRo0Pn0/en4eVGyWj 3hsMsQRPF4xnCddjQ2y79o/Gq+iFsW+KcXhr966E= From: "qrzhang at gatech dot edu" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug sanitizer/108845] New: Unnecessary signed integer overflow checks Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2023 19:24:35 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: sanitizer X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: qrzhang at gatech dot edu X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter cc target_milestone Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D108845 Bug ID: 108845 Summary: Unnecessary signed integer overflow checks Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: sanitizer Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: qrzhang at gatech dot edu CC: dodji at gcc dot gnu.org, dvyukov at gcc dot gnu.org, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org, kcc at gcc dot gnu.org, marxi= n at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- When compiled with "gcc -fsanitize=3Dsigned-integer-overflow -O3" (reproduc= ible on the latest trunk version), Gcc will produce ".UBSAN_CHECK_SUB" checks for the following code. =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D void printf(); void main() { int a; for (a =3D 0; a !=3D -3; a--) printf("%d\n", a); } =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D I noticed that clang could indeed optimize this program to three printf() c= alls with "-fsanitize=3Dsigned-integer-overflow -O3". Therefore, no overflow che= cks are needed. Is this behavior in GCC expected? Thanks!=