From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 13D3E3858C5E; Thu, 23 Feb 2023 17:20:41 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 13D3E3858C5E
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1677172841;
	bh=7QV2cMEyghI4CwAVVUEWgFyoH4zycHHldoRedJ1/s44=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=YL6l4OCNqK0ZEFF7gVO8TfL7MH3m2EYXSNmzXoHWqMYGkBYdJFeFSqmjdHzS7UYg8
	 w1lKlmt3289gx+k9GmhoAr1vi8plpzLUDHqAPxWMCRWArVnH8Bg9I2galJm1xtRrjs
	 M71/vYmcPmE100RrBXHfMaFn6b5xXKb1HpZJgbIc=
From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libstdc++/108846] std::copy, std::copy_n and std::copy_backward
  on potentially overlapping subobjects
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2023 17:20:39 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ABI
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: redi at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on everconfirmed
Message-ID: <bug-108846-4-BufpxOcdKP@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-108846-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-108846-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D108846

Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2023-02-23
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1

--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I don't think we need the ABI keyword here, the library can just avoid the
optimization for distance =3D=3D 1. That has no ABI impact.=