From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 0296E3858C54; Wed, 22 Feb 2023 07:12:33 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 0296E3858C54
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1677049954;
	bh=Ikal5uIBsUGSt2cHDxZI1HnTU/cXk1M6DDPNQ28XBz0=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=JMLR7FedIVpJdM3ifneUt/cFPkJFAKKjAY0zRBbcPu76NYg8uwwhuwaktuAxxXRig
	 6cgTlhus3Vi2WJixECnqclkMExolL7b+dGObHpH7fb6Hpi5RGfju43vLnb9+fKyXT6
	 tXIo/EzbCO+2QY7Ju91yki6cUm6GRTHp9M6TG5PY=
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug sanitizer/108880] [11/12/13 Regression] slow compilation with
 "-fsanitize=undefined"
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2023 07:12:33 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: sanitizer
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: compile-time-hog
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 11.4
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-108880-4-9AU715RJsM@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-108880-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-108880-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D108880

--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
It is still fast with the C++ front-end.

It is also still fast with -std=3Dgnu90 in GCC 11+.=