From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 712973858C5E; Thu, 23 Feb 2023 11:43:30 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 712973858C5E DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1677152610; bh=Jp/2VEk15ZKxNn4E6GMsp7Cm8k1FRZRtne/PV/bjF3A=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=UuY03zZcTHdun+sxgndTCKz1tJotTYiG0LvOrY3u+fSY1D/kk/7fl4Q173GHiedAl lLX3CEUMl5XFHWHL9iKgwdxLNZKKRFnvFyjgPB//9z7e2HdxYHdaQcLT5vUtAIi+7F 4jE3uL9/HEHLeo6AeJFqX01sYDPMb7rY6IbWVPj4= From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/108887] [13 Regression] ICE in process_function_and_variable_attributes since r13-3601 Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2023 11:43:28 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 13.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D108887 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- Honza, one possibility would be to add_cgraph_removal_hook for the duration= of analyze_functions which would update first_analyzed and remove it at the en= d. Or do we have some way to mark a symtab node for deferred removal, instead = of removing it right away?=