From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id B8CA33858C00; Thu, 23 Feb 2023 09:21:34 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org B8CA33858C00
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1677144094;
	bh=fc8ja7uU038VGVKN9a6dLrhRABcPZuyBEijeJrh8lA0=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=EX179jpLGf7d1P6LX2G6zPIMPhZD/rpLDU8A1b8a9OHMMXC+lrVB0kt002TiCGxGv
	 hflo392Kgfz0wWV3NSKQx/JvEK6i8PVMNrWQcKtzkmikVLykb6EGV8XZLINzQeXNOD
	 UB35ZMSKdUjfWzJ6ksmUamlrL2s3I/HpCNFTJ54I=
From: "ams at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug testsuite/108898] [13 Regression] Test introduced by
 r13-6278-g3da77f217c8b2089ecba3eb201e727c3fcdcd19d failed on i386
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2023 09:21:34 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: testsuite
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: testsuite-fail
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ams at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-108898-4-YdkpBsomwE@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-108898-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-108898-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D108898

--- Comment #1 from Andrew Stubbs <ams at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I tested it on i686-pc-linux-gnu before I posted the patch, and it was work=
ing
then. Can you be more specific what configuration you were testing, please?=