From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id A42973858C60; Fri, 10 Mar 2023 15:10:12 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org A42973858C60 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1678461012; bh=XMaJVXo8CECgmFValk19tzo0lJX6sYb+WfkBeqv7Mh4=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=vYQg/s273qOHcmoeObyLQ8QIoA+32Qly0DRXG7ead70KMonEgvyYcc2AaPbe49099 2ON26SnnODlN0Ikqwsi94h7lOcYEloxzwL6Ex/pjjSjbPDA763JX5Gqz5cLlFrX6Bl ObanxLY80z5YR26uL3uc3KV7w5gW4XI6CyH1HBvo= From: "clyon at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/108910] [12/13 Regression] Further ICE in aarch64_layout_arg Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2023 15:10:11 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: clyon at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 12.3 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D108910 Christophe Lyon changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #9 from Christophe Lyon --- Looking at #c6 again, the behavior of aarch64_function_arg_alignment does n= ot seem to match the comment preceding it. IIUC, it should ignore user alignme= nt. So is it expected that the alignment of TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT(type) is 512? (ie= . is the bug in aarch64_function_arg_alignment or earlier, when we build "type"?= )=