From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id E53743858D39; Mon, 3 Apr 2023 14:06:46 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org E53743858D39 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1680530806; bh=+IOruakudSCKtvynwvoSHz8sb3TsSvyV0UBM+uEehVg=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=oixY6upskg9WmXz79DlWZBfJ1NbOPd+2tT3ezaw4jEDnoDg0V4ZhjrBzBToqcDhy9 jjmTSRhxkXIOcqn9oLBEJkPh/Fg41579X1/jv+7T6D3CQMos8Dx4Ihp3jfLBv0VHyx a2yKPCW8WRJAQCD65f3ULtU4hVTEDB+KT7YEssLE= From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/108910] [12/13 Regression] Further ICE in aarch64_layout_arg Date: Mon, 03 Apr 2023 14:06:45 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 12.3 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D108910 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek --- Jason, any thoughts on why we for build_type_attribute_qual_variant call build_distinct_type_copy rather than build_variant_type_copy, which is e.g. what all spots in c-family/c-attribs.cc that need a separate type use? Or could we use build_variant_type_copy say for a subset of types (perhaps integral/pointer/reference/vector/complex types or something similar) and u= se distinct copies of the rest (function/method types, aggregates)?=