From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id C2FE4385840F; Fri, 24 Feb 2023 07:00:01 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org C2FE4385840F
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1677222001;
	bh=sW8xLaxE9U2O+SIGiMJ1i4VqeNLcmTR3lY97CTlW4iY=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=qA2Oxs+xipV1SRxvMB5SRPhraIs6q+qwsXOChEhXAQX6bYpEqVJS4TRVoQjVhF03b
	 FLayFiavH+rWgq7gSKln+LFps5nIGmsTpzvbh+Zp+hKBXm0EbX57rkD+pVXO4BLoGP
	 ezI0CDM4n2LaeOueaTvZD3L9gp4TDtCZm1463yoY=
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug debug/108917] ICE when specifying optimization level and
 debuging for C++ contracts code
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2023 07:00:01 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: debug
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: everconfirmed keywords bug_status
 cf_reconfirmed_on
Message-ID: <bug-108917-4-JjBYgpkMiG@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-108917-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-108917-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D108917

Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1
           Keywords|                            |ice-on-valid-code
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2023-02-24

--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Reduced testcase:
```
[[gnu::noipa]]
int f (int i) {
      return i + 100;
}

int g (int j) [[pre: f (j) < j ]] {
      return j;
}

```
It is the inlining of the contract into g which is causing the ICE.=