From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id C00BB3858CDA; Sun, 26 Feb 2023 11:16:38 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org C00BB3858CDA
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1677410198;
	bh=Q1FaQ/wzbkpu2xN9i0NwyGg2jfsfoEYY//imHyBvA5w=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=RmmTfXHC1wx9KIdavb17l85q68WQ8lC5UA/prsvUsR7IZkMG2n2vKNrYd6su0REqD
	 hlw+0WbSpHqZGHX0vjOQY7MR2vSIxcvn/ZOSySMXhSekxFgvCqM05iBKp6CKa8sJxU
	 AMhdFxOro9xM51N40DKFA6JO/uyp+K+ElYLKokS0=
From: "jkratochvil at azul dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/108922] fmod() 13x slowdown in gcc4.9 dropping "fprem"
 and calling fmod()
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2023 11:16:38 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.2.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jkratochvil at azul dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-108922-4-FMYRqnPkAd@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-108922-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-108922-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D108922

--- Comment #10 from Jan Kratochvil <jkratochvil at azul dot com> ---
(In reply to Alexander Monakov from comment #9)
> You just need to pass -fno-math-errno (the call is for setting errno,
> similar to how gcc emits the sqrt() sequence).

True, thanks.


So I think the patch should be reverted, right? I expect the revert should =
have
a testcase nowadays.=