From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 286873858D20; Mon, 27 Feb 2023 10:41:20 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 286873858D20 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1677494480; bh=p/6e5ju/DMC7KkziYtrNriXM12F3cnEB7QJ0LgXlnDI=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=pgol2CT6duIxojXPNBCdeMScT3pt5Ez+O7o7DjXmCB0T6xM+llPTUWBM2/NNqXpDs T1qPdmGIs2tAxC02NFpuGQ88L3QyFAG0QRNk0cPH4X7UmvsN2+APs4+MmBJw3WBNaf n41djTtd+MtJW9iDKAiEHkpC4fwprOO2E3+IRCNY= From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/108922] fmod() 13x slowdown in gcc4.9 dropping "fprem" and calling fmod() Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2023 10:41:19 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.2.1 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D108922 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #27 from Jakub Jelinek --- CCing Richard S. who has removed expand_errno_check in r6-4983-g883cabdecdb052865f. >From what I can see, can_test_argument_range doesn't handle FMOD (could it = test for x infinite or y zero?), edom_only_function does though.=