From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id D29F83858C66; Mon,  6 Mar 2023 19:23:20 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org D29F83858C66
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1678130600;
	bh=d8tCYokfKofXGvINnaI0ZHeg7J0eMqj2qqc3Cc9apOA=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=shMpGVir5X2cQYooZ/j+BuVEKOdb/fWDnAXjecBS4eRTljrGnbbtdgCWyyuQPUXen
	 0TvHOSowWcWgdlRLF022oC4x6AgbKnt8+lmatq17TmaRmoxdfbkg4QG9fmH5y4GVpr
	 nvzZj+UPI5wC6vFRMReZukZASOnb99KDp2ew6Wn0=
From: "mikael at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/108925] memory leak of gfc_get_namespace result
Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2023 19:23:20 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-108925-4-ai91Km7vOA@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-108925-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-108925-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D108925

Mikael Morin <mikael at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |mikael at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #1 from Mikael Morin <mikael at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Can't reproduce with simple examples, testcase?
I have used the following case, it does show some leaks, but none with
load_needed in the backtrace.

module m
  integer i
end module m

module n
  use m
contains
  subroutine s(a)
    integer a
    i =3D a
  end subroutine
end module n

program p
  use n
  call s(0)
  print *, i
end program=