From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id F3E6B3858C83; Wed, 15 Mar 2023 11:44:20 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org F3E6B3858C83 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1678880661; bh=mxw7qQ7ahmoDtfX5AUg1z5WCSlhbtRnMLNu66H+3EFM=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=r7S2MeEVt5SPNjm9H+yevubYwv/tyUO4rf6Ww81xglyHKUdm8Fyu4XrhecZlnhzmz 4ICqUEFad2cS7COdo9CnSh/M+AHq+pQy+DuiuI333CaSVuPtFtM8OvsCOi+Fkzozsc GtRqRc0S3VIMmXccl2nn5GozbSUbtCABudoh/kRU= From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/108933] [10/11/12/13 Regression] Missing bswap detection Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2023 11:44:20 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 10.5 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D108933 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek --- As mentioned in the other PR, this isn't a bswap. If the bswap pass should optimize this, there would need to be a new optab for this and corresponding internal function, which bswap patch could use if the optab is defined.=