From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 6F379385B52A; Mon,  6 Mar 2023 10:09:36 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 6F379385B52A
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1678097376;
	bh=G7Hd5SJZoiH2fUmgexEsU6crat25wYBCYIaLwYBldFY=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=VU4Xh1YWdP7l1fFKHP13G+drovs2v+d6RZrEdgt3bW9FgT5BlGy0yQiuBABC2AmbU
	 cesjpw31LstPsDrvK0rcSTNChj1YVApMpQNfSNGmYgdKTbibM54LX7DVuIHeInpwKi
	 vJjRuZdaYspaWeFrH3Px/0I7Ae5tAJnNuV+kpjBg=
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/108938] Missing bswap detection
Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2023 10:09:36 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-108938-4-UZIhhNZPwd@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-108938-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-108938-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D108938

--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Though, if more than one replacement operation is emitted, one needs to be
careful not to emit more expensive replacement than the original sequence
(especially if some subexpressions aren't single use).=