public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c/108941] Error: operand type mismatch for `shr' with binutils master Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2023 08:10:22 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-108941-4-0HtOsBTr0h@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-108941-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108941 --- Comment #17 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to jbeulich from comment #16) > I can only repeat: Unless the anomaly is properly called out in non-internal > documentation, I continue to think there's a bug here. And the reference to For inline asm, the only important things besides the exact values are the mode (for integral scalar modes that determines mostly how many bits it has), constraints (which determine where it can be passed and limit set of valid values) and optional modifiers which change how it is printed. > Clang getting it right, which you simply put off, isn't entirely meaningless > imo (I agree we're talking about a GNU extension here, but that doesn't > imply only GNU tools can get it right). Clang definitely doesn't implement the GNU extension correctly, far from it, because it broke the basic premise that it is a black box for the compiler on which it performs a text replacement. It instead parses and assembles the text, so behaves completely differently from how the extension was defined. So it can't be then safely used for optimization barriers, one can't use there something not really valid in the assembler etc.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-28 8:10 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2023-02-27 9:39 [Bug c/108941] New: " marxin at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-02-27 9:51 ` [Bug c/108941] " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-02-27 10:00 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-02-27 10:07 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-02-27 10:17 ` jbeulich at suse dot com 2023-02-27 10:33 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-02-27 10:57 ` jbeulich at suse dot com 2023-02-27 11:00 ` jbeulich at suse dot com 2023-02-27 11:02 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-02-27 11:11 ` jbeulich at suse dot com 2023-02-27 11:14 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-02-27 11:17 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-02-27 11:17 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-02-27 11:23 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-02-28 7:33 ` jbeulich at suse dot com 2023-02-28 7:47 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-02-28 7:59 ` jbeulich at suse dot com 2023-02-28 8:10 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-108941-4-0HtOsBTr0h@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).