From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 24C0E3858C50; Mon, 27 Feb 2023 21:27:59 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 24C0E3858C50 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1677533279; bh=5G+72tPtzP5xPfGSQY2PfTIaFgihxhLuKw/YCxD7igs=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=ndw4/CJBZWw5dRYZSd4+dLZ9uKyn9ZjEpUWOiUH0E4BILs4Jkvr+9isZLw69xEEjc 6Yymo45hWyfTPT7r0EE6fafqAiVJ1F0+TGdZ+Sf+a9Z2l+SiIZW7ZH0ULuwFFvAU52 XxZF++pzKNlgsSAXOu3zO9w1L5dY8sV/Cxc4KX64= From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libstdc++/108952] [10/11/12/13 Regression] Regression in uses_allocator_construction_args for pair of rvalue references Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2023 21:27:58 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.1.1 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: rejects-valid X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: redi at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: redi at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: short_desc keywords cf_known_to_fail cf_known_to_work Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D108952 Jonathan Wakely changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Regression in |[10/11/12/13 Regression] |uses_allocator_construction |Regression in |_args for pair of rvalue |uses_allocator_construction |references |_args for pair of rvalue | |references Keywords| |rejects-valid Known to fail| |10.1.0, 11.1.0, 12.1.0, | |13.0, 9.2.0 Known to work| |8.5.0, 9.1.0 --- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely --- Aha, I broke std::get(pair&&) for C++20 mode.=