From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 90F033858C5F; Mon, 27 Feb 2023 17:33:11 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 90F033858C5F
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1677519191;
	bh=7QbiZn86B4Dax+4JqXxSsFK0Tib8bSFfnL5rBklMwbk=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=BUt9hheAS0/IVGxFrtX5sZ+zzaK84iSuD+7NZuTMKo4ZxOwt4bu7MFvcDIgwUQZtE
	 CS1kg3qrRkrwTPWlVoEPUi9yIv16nmtNDZjZvFsbWlumgAKMMc6LEQH+R6wEp49nfR
	 L42TGq2yp7ODJ8J6CE+7rCt9MVQ/avAVQfwLEIME=
From: "pdimov at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libstdc++/108952] Regression in
 uses_allocator_construction_args for pair of rvalue references
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2023 17:33:11 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.1.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pdimov at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: redi at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-108952-4-sJyZ8I1ZAU@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-108952-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-108952-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D108952

Peter Dimov <pdimov at gmail dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |pdimov at gmail dot com

--- Comment #4 from Peter Dimov <pdimov at gmail dot com> ---
An easy fix is to use `std::get<0>` instead of `.first`.=