From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 37CCF3858D37; Thu, 2 Mar 2023 21:41:03 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 37CCF3858D37 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1677793263; bh=d6AxoPwxeCnjlqq/G6iT9ExyZ2q5q/RPt88ufTtjHic=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=cLysi7BY9GUwCjUo5g+yleAkx66hr6YlbwUIpvC1B3caqcuk5YdNPdmQHXb1tVlw+ kwBvnGwmHs7QwaFJv+Ac3PUsNfohiRYMUKhnVyvwQQbRdYpoRF3Q/8wNiQv3+F0tlf kKcYznogYoZ5Lr5Ikel5CYKNj7upAvIacOkbSk5k= From: "andrew.cooper3 at citrix dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug analyzer/108968] fanalyzer false positive with the uninitalised-ness of the stack pointer Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2023 21:41:03 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: analyzer X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: andrew.cooper3 at citrix dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D108968 --- Comment #15 from Andrew Cooper --- Wow that's a lot of junk getting included for the minimal include set I cou= ld easily make. It occurs to me only after posting that you're liable to fail at: asm ( ".include \"arch/x86/include/asm/asm-macros.h\"" ); which always trips things up. You can safely drop it if you're just intere= sted in the analyser behaviour.=