public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libstdc++/108969] New: [13 Regression] Initializing iostreams in the library needs a GLIBCXX_3.4.31 versioned symbol
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2023 13:08:29 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-108969-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108969

            Bug ID: 108969
           Summary: [13 Regression] Initializing iostreams in the library
                    needs a GLIBCXX_3.4.31 versioned symbol
           Product: gcc
           Version: 13.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Keywords: ABI
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: libstdc++
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: redi at gcc dot gnu.org
  Target Milestone: ---

The fix for PR 44952 is an ABI change because code compiled with GCC 13 relies
on the init happening once in the library. If a binary compiled with GCC 13
uses libstdc++.so.6.0.30 at runtime then it will segfault when trying to use
the streams. Even though this scenario is unsupported, it would be much better
to get an error from ld.so

             reply	other threads:[~2023-02-28 13:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-02-28 13:08 redi at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2023-02-28 13:09 ` [Bug libstdc++/108969] " redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-02-28 13:21 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-02-28 13:22 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-02-28 13:25 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-02-28 13:28 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-02-28 13:30 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-02-28 13:34 ` fw at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-02-28 13:36 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-02-28 13:51 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-02-28 13:54 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-02-28 14:09 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-03-03 17:25 ` ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-03-08  9:20 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-03-08  9:28 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-03-27 10:55 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-04-18 15:58 ` [Bug libstdc++/108969] [13/14 " cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-04-18 16:00 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-04-18 16:00 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-04-18 16:31 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-04-18 16:31 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-04-19 14:17 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-04-19 14:17 ` sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-04-19 14:25 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-04-19 14:45 ` fw at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-04-19 14:48 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-04-26  6:57 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-04-26 18:15 ` xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-04-28  8:50 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-04-28 20:57 ` romain.geissler at amadeus dot com
2023-04-28 20:58 ` romain.geissler at amadeus dot com
2023-04-28 21:16 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-04-28 21:21 ` romain.geissler at amadeus dot com
2023-05-04  7:44 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-04  7:49 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-108969-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).