From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 278B13858412; Tue,  7 Mar 2023 21:43:18 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 278B13858412
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1678225398;
	bh=JIq7eZiwUEKlrm4wTAQafZteZrtsBRtBn1NzH3idMBs=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=rsw68NVRTyh+jVAgqIV6DeisTFLJQpFjY4DTe6+aB4kWn3y8/rSw/Vqi9UAd9A5Gu
	 FsCUB0qrA25+edust45GVcEk2GxN5UMKS8GkerwpZKHKIzQVd8joeiyJQPwzTumU3Q
	 qStVMcuNo0p95gDN7GQC8Yn4mBJ3ZW1qtSTEY8M8=
From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libstdc++/108976] codecvt for Unicode allows surrogate code
 points
Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2023 21:43:17 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: redi at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-108976-4-ZKwkdMvgC3@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-108976-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-108976-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D108976

--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Excellent, thanks! I'll look at the commits tomorrow and get back to you.

A patch will need to be submitted to the mailing lists, but it might be OK =
to
send a single diff for the whole series, but then I could merge the 8 commi=
ts
(without squashing them). I'll see if that makes sense (and would be OK by =
our
policies) and let you know.=