From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id AE8763858D33; Wed,  1 Mar 2023 07:54:29 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org AE8763858D33
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1677657269;
	bh=uMkk1dN4htIyN+XiFRyKqUu2QMzY5L6pEg+hDxhQXLs=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=wg8JBNgvhvy5asZMxR7yUFURxAhoRlX5sHwt4tPMlh7JVRLdWVFziJjRQ5EE4O9g2
	 SwPXm2XBEZncesDUFtk8OK1Cyn1Ml/qY6jvpXfeEeO+qMMeaiwxkQnmgYJgc6dn3yZ
	 R79rw1qHvrf9ih5Si4EDK11qkZcnFU6fkpR5NaQw=
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/108980] [13 Regression] Warning text missing
 the warning itself (GCC 13)
Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2023 07:54:28 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-108980-4-aN48oBnyFj@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-108980-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-108980-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D108980

Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #4)
> Created attachment 54562 [details]
> Patch which I think is correct but not 100% sure

LGTM.  Please test & post.=