From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id C1CCD3858CDB; Thu,  2 Mar 2023 20:42:48 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org C1CCD3858CDB
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1677789768;
	bh=0dh2LwXKswazu/YBMJuCnZU2XdtwAMfp9HVcwzcCjJA=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=lAImXF9b9QMccnG+nXKvCvN+vaqvomuAUwMYOAbwsMlY3iz1mVV0JycbOm5Uo6xck
	 Ozk+RK52cMWlGLM+zlfQpAtZvs1nOLKbPwdC6XwKeSZGvWKridJ3kWBO3o/9R1lKf/
	 vid/3vBrkGGS5lyV0HbCSMfXoDNMwIuZIe6vlgH0=
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/108993] Value initialization does not occur for derived
 class , for gcc versions > 5
Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2023 20:42:48 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: keywords
Message-ID: <bug-108993-4-WMSuAMq60A@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-108993-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-108993-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D108993

Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|                            |wrong-code

--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Hmm,
 I noticed that since GCC 7 with -std=3Dc++17, the b.x is not initialized a=
t all.
So the question I have is there a difference between C++ standards here?

Note the issue is we call Base's constructor after doing the zero
initialization and the Base's constructor has a clobber in it which I think=
 is
correct.

This is all front-end generation and not exactly related to the optimizatio=
ns
directly.=