From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 9A6823858C62; Fri, 3 Mar 2023 07:45:26 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 9A6823858C62 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1677829526; bh=54YcygvixLcapDwM7X/kyweGpWzNr9gcMfOvJv+i1cE=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=sofZvkxHlQOdSNQh7WNIye6Zg4qbocjVAwFVoeSP/X5hv96SvqAJ4DQULcuAke2lM 8fmw2l2G3DLqv0+FN9iWn4pyn0BahQbiFBhIvKYyPxmVri4xffA4+q/F0T9lBufV3h /8d2uxcX92tbUjzd3eirfuIKfY9qqGwvQf2B8v+Y= From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libgcc/108994] [13 Regression] LLVM JIT segfaults in libgcc after upgrading from gcc 12.2.1 to 13.0.1 Date: Fri, 03 Mar 2023 07:45:26 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: libgcc X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 13.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D108994 --- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Tom Stellard from comment #6) > (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #5) > > (In reply to Tom Stellard from comment #4) > > > This test case was passing with older versions of LLVM/Clang + gcc-13= .0.1, > > > so I bisected it down to this commit: > > > https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/ > > > 6747fc07d1aa94e22622e278e5a02ba70675ac9b > >=20 > > can you bisect GCC instead? >=20 > I can try do you have any tips for speeding up the build? Maybe try before and after the revisions I mentioned first.=