public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "tstellar at redhat dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/108994] [13 Regression] LLVM JIT segfaults in libgcc after upgrading from gcc 12.2.1 to 13.0.1
Date: Fri, 03 Mar 2023 18:37:18 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-108994-4-IXD9aYHFky@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-108994-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108994
--- Comment #11 from Tom Stellard <tstellar at redhat dot com> ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #10)
> I'd start with verification if it is really libgcc, so don't recompile the
> app, just try it against GCC 12.2.1 libgcc vs. 13.0.1.
I confirmed it's libgcc. On F37, the test passes, but then if I do `dnf
upgrade --releasever 39 libgcc` the test fails.
I'll start trying to bisect.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-03 18:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-02 18:15 [Bug libgcc/108994] New: " tstellar at redhat dot com
2023-03-02 18:19 ` [Bug libgcc/108994] [13 Regression] " redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-03-02 19:15 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-03-02 19:19 ` tstellar at redhat dot com
2023-03-02 20:09 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-03-03 3:13 ` tstellar at redhat dot com
2023-03-03 3:29 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-03-03 7:39 ` tstellar at redhat dot com
2023-03-03 7:45 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-03-03 7:46 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-03-03 7:47 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-03-03 8:45 ` [Bug target/108994] " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-03-03 18:37 ` tstellar at redhat dot com [this message]
2023-03-04 0:15 ` tstellar at redhat dot com
2023-03-06 12:37 ` [Bug target/108994] [13 Regression] LLVM JIT segfaults in libgcc after upgrading from gcc 12.2.1 to 13.0.1 since r13-2706-g6e80a1d164d1f9 marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-03-09 16:29 ` tstellar at redhat dot com
2023-03-09 18:50 ` tstellar at redhat dot com
2023-03-10 17:18 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-03-10 17:37 ` tstellar at redhat dot com
2023-03-14 5:41 ` tstellar at redhat dot com
2023-03-14 7:04 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-03-14 17:22 ` tstellar at redhat dot com
2023-03-14 18:08 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-108994-4-IXD9aYHFky@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
--to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).