From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id EF6373858C78; Fri, 3 Mar 2023 15:14:34 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org EF6373858C78 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1677856474; bh=iOfucFtVVAElLotXXQ/eqxnJa9qA5MLL96gtL+BpHBs=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=Wq6bgwptcX/9Suti01Rvnj2U8imgux24Hekn4Hm68LAJ2+CQrYfnQHGIDnz8qTxSV /DNNp3JJB9R49Pp4fntahUM03uUDIAWJnjFlPolpBHOSGVf135l08KQaw/+XyFk14Y wDoPzRuxRIsj+sALockf0BNiDHcEmQq58ufXtmDc= From: "ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/108998] [12/13 Regression] ICE in tsubst, at cp/pt.cc:16037 Date: Fri, 03 Mar 2023 15:14:33 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 12.3 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: short_desc cf_known_to_work cf_known_to_fail target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D108998 Patrick Palka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|[13 Regression] ICE in |[12/13 Regression] ICE in |tsubst, at cp/pt.cc:16037 |tsubst, at cp/pt.cc:16037 Known to work| |12.2.0 Known to fail| |12.2.1, 13.0 Target Milestone|13.0 |12.3 --- Comment #4 from Patrick Palka --- (In reply to waffl3x from comment #3) > I made a mistake in my previous comment, the version on my system that fa= ils > is 12.2.1, sorry for any possible confusion. Thus marking this a regression on the 12 branch as well=