From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 4913C3858D37; Fri,  3 Mar 2023 04:39:41 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 4913C3858D37
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1677818381;
	bh=Ppu5g7v3QXcuelynIUPFOMzh8bF5j3AFo3uH1n4Ax8Y=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:From;
	b=MGc6MQLX6f9rk++BcaxB1G+haX4EqnwNYFJ37Dj9UjtDvEuVBuUG/j/BteAlnuhnB
	 ybgTGWEU/Pcn2lTtBoG/lcSFO4xPmTBinRstDngXtMhSOFagUYRotHaRw6cCiH+9mN
	 oxwQSqFMZxKbiOi2/u739fedROScSni66wi/46ME=
From: "headch at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: =?UTF-8?B?W0J1ZyBjKysvMTA5MDAxXSBOZXc6IOKAnG5vIGRlY2xhcmF0aW9u?=
 =?UTF-8?B?IG1hdGNoZXPigJ0gZm9yIGNvbXBsaWNhdGVkIG5vbi10eXBlIHRlbXBsYXRl?=
 =?UTF-8?B?IHBhcmFtZXRlcnM=?=
Date: Fri, 03 Mar 2023 04:39:40 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.2.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: headch at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status
 bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone
Message-ID: <bug-109001-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D109001

            Bug ID: 109001
           Summary: =E2=80=9Cno declaration matches=E2=80=9D for complicate=
d non-type
                    template parameters
           Product: gcc
           Version: 12.2.1
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: c++
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: headch at gmail dot com
  Target Milestone: ---

I=E2=80=99m reasonably certain (but not completely) that this is valid code:

#include <algorithm>
#include <cstddef>

template<size_t x>
class C {
public:
template<size_t y>
C<std::max(x, y)> set();
};

template<size_t x>
template<size_t y>
C<std::max(x, y)> C<x>::set() {
return {};
}

however, GCC rejects it with =E2=80=9Cerror: no declaration matches =E2=80=
=98C<std::max<long
unsigned int>(x, y)> C<x>::set()=E2=80=99=E2=80=9D on the out-of-body funct=
ion definition. This
is accepted in GCC 11.3, as well as the latest versions of Clang and MSVC on
gcc.godbolt.org. Interestingly, GCC 12 also accepts the code if I change the
function definition (just the definition, not the in-body declaration) to u=
se
trailing-return-type syntax:

#include <algorithm>
#include <cstddef>

template<size_t x>
class C {
public:
template<size_t y>
C<std::max(x, y)> set();
};

template<size_t x>
template<size_t y>
auto C<x>::set() -> C<std::max(x, y)> {
return {};
}=