From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 20DFC3858404; Thu, 16 Mar 2023 11:12:09 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 20DFC3858404 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1678965129; bh=EQlsLVCSMJKFz/CVohMcBaPEPuGfVLwppTgpj4KxAj4=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=LbHNyetFBp8cgyDoHGJ6pLKP7yK5tHmap3hSz/XJbkOvRqmhcouWNjqxqHx0DJ8zU yv9Lv2+CpdDiRwBIBXes9UXB8HMvxsToBRCNg7KCuSe8sBIQCAb1v3pDU9FqWrnaPJ emYNxQ+NXjk4kdctfGKSi1ZMwmukp59iejoEotgs= From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/109004] [10/11/12/13 Regression] wrong code for -O2 (any above -O0) with g++ 11.3 for POWER9 (cross-compiler on x86_64 host) Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2023 11:12:08 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.3.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: WORKSFORME X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 10.5 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: resolution bug_status Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D109004 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- Looks like qemu bug to me. I get the exact same output even with your bina= ries on native power9.=