From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 276B5385B52F; Fri,  3 Mar 2023 12:58:24 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 276B5385B52F
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1677848304;
	bh=9E0mJrLHFrX1kXz5atF6pqn3ELxpTM84FLMBcebOzZA=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=VBplmPGtS2t8c0Fwqbjf5S/KMByP7RP4Tvmxo6ysOzlBfYYruOZG+/Z9lv5h/hIkr
	 NIPGxhwmz2tNLqJpYCWlJRoXkA6pJ+dydthe2ymuyJpFHwsHR45LLPsCUDZkY6LHOu
	 nnH1fLfU4TqxvzIlHD2g+yFEZWX0senZQU+0W6O0=
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug ada/109005] [13 Regression] ICE during GIMPLE pass: ifcvt
Date: Fri, 03 Mar 2023 12:58:23 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: ada
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-109005-4-rUemaUCb4i@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-109005-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-109005-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D109005

Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |avieira at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
It helps pointing to the offender - we likely get a 'get_bitfield_rep' that=
's
not suitable for a register.

  /* Bail out if the representative is BLKmode as we will not be able to
     vectorize this.  */
  if (TYPE_MODE (TREE_TYPE (rep_decl)) =3D=3D E_BLKmode)=20
    return NULL_TREE;

should probably be !is_gimple_reg_type (TREE_TYPE (rep_decl)) but hard to
say without digging in.=