From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 263BC3858CDB; Fri,  3 Mar 2023 12:14:31 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 263BC3858CDB
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1677845671;
	bh=YGylmzKOFd8aHo5YazUtN50R8BC5lYvfbCG/gPgnEI0=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=NXSMVC/fWIgsFan5eqgkZfbVcDhsSMyyITWNnj/ayXWwiqOrb1CR0qnKPOTRKiAfh
	 jNoAFu8EVP2FyutzJFopPtshW3WwaWPBmG3SrPBvCTdtkgJ7BGdg2cTNJvAx0o+QKP
	 tIds/5qhy9IXKsdQ3xgpxfFeff/G+BtmVwF5RvVE=
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/109008] [13 Regression] Maybe wrong code in
 scipy package since r13-3926-gd4c2f1d376da6f
Date: Fri, 03 Mar 2023 12:14:30 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status everconfirmed cf_reconfirmed_on
 priority
Message-ID: <bug-109008-4-nxzNSuUreP@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-109008-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-109008-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D109008

Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2023-03-03
           Priority|P3                          |P1

--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Confirmed.  EVRP folds the return to 0=