From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 01DAF3858CDB; Fri,  3 Mar 2023 18:03:29 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 01DAF3858CDB
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1677866610;
	bh=AMUfUftNf8aNw0a49PGP+EwuL7nzEq9PyhYp9WACJ3A=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=f2x9cy4v27cXRilNx2ZjIsXdqvE64/TggM/4EHosmaGoRLZ59nf3ZmbNELTtwj35C
	 N2CDpuCEGY4DoyOIbThoz4rQxgXgUfjuVTG/ChlkcsvkHtlS0fvVRP6r6QmYb6iL1p
	 wV4Dr0nHstGFcXWVpzWPM+SKG0+0ZAtSy1AQT56k=
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/109013] [OpenMP] Diagnose if multiple 'omp ordered'
 appear in a loop body
Date: Fri, 03 Mar 2023 18:03:29 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic, openmp
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-109013-4-3lp6zO2pxc@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-109013-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-109013-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D109013

--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Even the dominating case could be valid.
E.g. if the body does
#pragma omp ordered
foo ();
bar ();
#pragma omp ordered
baz ();
where bar () calls exit (0);=