From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 8DFB33858D35; Sun,  5 Mar 2023 22:32:21 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 8DFB33858D35
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1678055541;
	bh=7MnZBvLSvGoNR8gwYuELfMknUkBuuQch+7q+IDDLL+0=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=fqKWzPa7TuGUv9oezmJuMuZ8tGgmV+ntOokY0cP1miuhF40q8JLdzdyARGQHEuLsq
	 rn54rcIQgg7S+NBC2mL2wEUjglhrOxY5iT9nb24aQDtCx5m4VEgNrLFosBFsUuVm0p
	 XD3U4/xtB9v4Awq7knu+pa0FHlxzxFNMtuyGajqs=
From: "roland.illig at gmx dot de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug modula2/109032] message 'compiler checks to force' is too
 complicated
Date: Sun, 05 Mar 2023 22:32:21 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: modula2
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: roland.illig at gmx dot de
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: gaius at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-109032-4-b189ltlsli@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-109032-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-109032-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D109032

--- Comment #4 from Roland Illig <roland.illig at gmx dot de> ---
While here:
> (*
>    BuildDivM2 - build and return ((op2 < 0) : (op1 divtrunc op2) ? (op1 d=
ivfloor op2))
>                 when -fiso, -fpim4 or -fpositive-mod-floor-div is present=
 else
>                 return op1 div trunc op2
> *)

Did you swap the operators '?' and ':' here?
I had to look this up because this message was completely unclear to me:

> force positive result from MOD and DIV result floor

The explanation from gm2.texi is much clearer:

> All modulus results are positive and the results from the division are
rounded to the floor.=