From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 7AF7B3858D28; Sun,  5 Mar 2023 22:17:01 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 7AF7B3858D28
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1678054621;
	bh=GhUgnczUWZPfZyRehr0AsHCTeuo9oIhziN5dCfbCyd8=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=T9C1Ve0Akqt/hLlHDA5Twv/K+zB7PpxqqKo+LpXCG7R5+OiP+1kkn9fRYSsKNHjc0
	 iBs9batnGTAgnRonhDoEFX6hTlV+5XVKvPqV9IkQIjycji2DsHo8MuyuyujoRpw82U
	 0nDSimu2wRNReDKagoIJ0ao2GHmz8lxHzzHra/H4=
From: "roland.illig at gmx dot de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug modula2/109032] message 'compiler checks to force' is too
 complicated
Date: Sun, 05 Mar 2023 22:17:01 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: modula2
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: roland.illig at gmx dot de
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: gaius at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-109032-4-nkhKPX2Fqn@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-109032-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-109032-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D109032

--- Comment #2 from Roland Illig <roland.illig at gmx dot de> ---
While here:
> turns on runtime checking to check whether a floating point number is abo=
ut to exceed range

What exactly does "is about to" mean, and why didn't you just write "exceeds
the range"?=