From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id ABC0F3858C30; Tue, 7 Mar 2023 17:38:20 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org ABC0F3858C30 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1678210700; bh=w7iVj+1vrtq4duy7pL60uCZwucWZWEiOwV1K2lnKFZE=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=RcUMNRtGqYIFVr/GR3IhwQua70JcNJsKv/Eq8hMx81E5pI1W211pAjpVQIgEVRuBR Hf10ZZSJyF/MlsU75CzbhndB5KNfFMg0Xid5S8SBoqUTdpC03JpC+5ZQdERfkBg3rR 2RneqOEPmjg2C7zizHY32Ujf/T1qkMmeJCx+qjEs= From: "hbucher at gmail dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/109057] Does GCC interpret assembly when deciding to optimize away a variable? Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2023 17:38:20 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown X-Bugzilla-Keywords: inline-asm X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: hbucher at gmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: INVALID X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D109057 --- Comment #9 from Henry --- Just to make it clear, I'm not saying this is a bug on GCC.=20 Im just trying to understand what is happening since this is affecting some= of our benchmarks. Then we can counter with some wit.=20 Perhaps there is an alternate venue for this type of clarification? I tried Reddit but no dice. The GCC IRC channel perhaps?=