public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/109067] Powerpc GCC does not support __ibm128 complex multiply/divide if long double is IEEE 128-bit.
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2023 18:48:51 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-109067-4-EUEQCeYwYR@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-109067-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109067

--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by Michael Meissner <meissner@gcc.gnu.org>:

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c67f312d20e15e5aa18c587693b4ab7e131596c1

commit r13-6763-gc67f312d20e15e5aa18c587693b4ab7e131596c1
Author: Michael Meissner <meissner@linux.ibm.com>
Date:   Mon Mar 20 14:48:06 2023 -0400

    Rework 128-bit complex multiply and divide.

    This patch reworks how the complex multiply and divide built-in functions
are
    done.  Previously GCC created built-in declarations for doing long double
complex
    multiply and divide when long double is IEEE 128-bit.  However, it did not
    support __ibm128 complex multiply and divide if long double is IEEE
128-bit.

    This code does not create the built-in declaration with the changed name.
    Instead, it uses the TARGET_MANGLE_DECL_ASSEMBLER_NAME hook to change the
name
    before it is written out to the assembler file like it now does for all of
the
    other long double built-in functions.

    2023-03-20   Michael Meissner  <meissner@linux.ibm.com>

    gcc/

            PR target/109067
            * config/rs6000/rs6000.cc (create_complex_muldiv): Delete.
            (init_float128_ieee): Delete code to switch complex multiply and
divide
            for long double.
            (complex_multiply_builtin_code): New helper function.
            (complex_divide_builtin_code): Likewise.
            (rs6000_mangle_decl_assembler_name): Add support for mangling the
name
            of complex 128-bit multiply and divide built-in functions.

    gcc/testsuite/

            PR target/109067
            * gcc.target/powerpc/divic3-1.c: New test.
            * gcc.target/powerpc/divic3-2.c: Likewise.
            * gcc.target/powerpc/mulic3-1.c: Likewise.
            * gcc.target/powerpc/mulic3-2.c: Likewise.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-03-20 18:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-03-08 19:13 [Bug target/109067] New: " meissner at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-03-08 19:41 ` [Bug target/109067] " segher at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-03-20 18:48 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2023-04-11  2:53 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-04-11 14:14 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-04-11 14:15 ` meissner at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-109067-4-EUEQCeYwYR@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).