From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id D14313858CDB; Thu,  9 Mar 2023 12:45:01 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org D14313858CDB
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1678365901;
	bh=hYb44cvdHSQSBaISBFYpqnX2WZPt6GENJyp1LUcMsV4=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=Zc6kCJQGL63k1nAI72z7yi/ignO68THOOmgmjvIlcJF+vzxbBvf/RHBsDYFdMBItB
	 42jI8IGg2XkfYp5VIl1u5CXgl+FnuXQjgTatYutRIpqibmnpU3I+Yvtd3p7wTmsIY/
	 Qx5mQwzuY6JviMzNxR/pSYGljzXZ2Dsx2gKgz+uk=
From: "linkw at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/109069] Vector truncation test program produces
 incorrect result on big-endian powerpc64-linux-gnu with -mcpu=power10 -O2
Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2023 12:45:01 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.1.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: linkw at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-109069-4-bcK6Ybchmk@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-109069-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-109069-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D109069

--- Comment #2 from Kewen Lin <linkw at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Thanks for reporting, I don't have a handy Power10 ppc64 (BE) env for
reproducing this, do you mind to reduce it a bit first? (hint:
https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/A_guide_to_testcase_reduction)

btw, I tried to check if we can reproduce this on Power10 ppc64le as the co=
de
having __BYTE_ORDER__ check which seems to say it works on both BE and LE, =
but
it gets segfault on LE, even I used one power9 ppc64le machine and option
-mcpu=3Dpower8 -O0. Any thoughts?=