From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 317913858D39; Wed, 15 Mar 2023 14:29:26 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 317913858D39
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1678890566;
	bh=H5Aabot03BDp7Y8KWdiFOiMiVKI9t2fQSUFqsWnPrM4=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=rb5zWeHzHt9FUjVe9qFJragL9Qtmrf0Qz1jLgy37M7NQCjMcN7JpizgNSeMTMUCEA
	 pscjL3PkItnwnsuUNUiczNM9LTsa37tqUEjABilX5l4gEwWtFivNq0a14ixCS8JwJ3
	 xHgsuuUeQiATh6P3Y9edWYJUddEHXCTiRiToWJxY=
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/109083] [10/11/12/13 Regression] Incorrect static_assert
 shown in diagnostics
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2023 14:29:26 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.2.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-109083-4-h7L639KIZD@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-109083-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-109083-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D109083

--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I wonder why we instantiate from unused_function (but don't diagnose) at al=
l?=