From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 9624F3858002; Fri, 31 Mar 2023 14:59:15 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 9624F3858002
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1680274755;
	bh=y4o2Hp43tu/krjpzBnJcCiwxUzobkmX3WLmTcvu7bQ8=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=LwOcCuMVQ7HBV13p9vMiTC4szPtoMH1BUqR6l0brhhODX/+rwjbxn3OynxHu/tV26
	 +c3wgzZksIAHFvBdlafhueY3l62kLB+dBEWXWum3X2wJocfRVIInd8hVREg9/eppaG
	 elKzoZ++iWBPptWGgsbTzvr1/lNi6YwmHBxU57R4=
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/109087] [13 Regression] csmith: end of year runtime bug
 since r13-4839-geef81eefcdc2a581
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2023 14:59:13 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-109087-4-vTiVeEwknL@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-109087-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-109087-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D109087

--- Comment #18 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
It is true that with r13-6661 + r13-6691 this bug is just latent, so perhap=
s it
doesn't need to be P1 unless somebody comes up with a reproducer.=