From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 9C8FF3858D35; Fri, 10 Nov 2023 13:10:15 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 9C8FF3858D35
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1699621815;
	bh=cMd2IvpDNweKf1OqVDMmZTrlTur3d7aLR0Pt9QIg6hY=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=Dw7RgDG+K1I/b0VPSpTCr39iAWeBDql0+vUiVmvQeWrYtP8CemkhWDJ3gd6VVgUn5
	 2AdGd5SoDMcCaeGY3qg1le5OPVeFnu0bJ8eOGItXZDExQcMtSq+3gcEG7GRe9u8riz
	 MIarts/gkxbls6HMV6AmwLfePNi4yy7cxcSFmbbk=
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/109088] GCC does not always vectorize
 conditional reduction
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2023 13:10:15 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-109088-4-09NKgdpOTn@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-109088-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-109088-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D109088

--- Comment #16 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
it's not exactly clear what the transform is you propose.  it looks like a
re-association but SSA names do not match up but the transform only replaces
a single op with 0!?=