From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 081033858D39; Thu, 16 Nov 2023 01:06:24 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 081033858D39
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1700096785;
	bh=ssDAXKurspOnDzsi7fDczVfoENzxKmOuKWeG4Lem6zA=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=W73+yXxhqFZM+ahqMdqTREx2l9SCkWeuCIlu5qgM5S+ekw4Ay6wAZn2T6JIeEFkRf
	 7CE8HKIX0tukdgxOHwZw5jgJ8i65cZ60ugkMbpS4WSfzWubd+V2Z2Dp/+Jt3Akcqxm
	 jYGqvtcBpoCKwa5UEHL0Hsz9+ekFVgbMZBEdTsOA=
From: "juzhe.zhong at rivai dot ai" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/109088] GCC does not always vectorize
 conditional reduction
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2023 01:06:17 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: juzhe.zhong at rivai dot ai
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-109088-4-rv0kaHZvqZ@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-109088-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-109088-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D109088

--- Comment #21 from JuzheZhong <juzhe.zhong at rivai dot ai> ---
Thanks Richi.

Does re-associating (with eliminating exceptions) in if-convert is a reason=
able
approach ?

If yes, I am gonna to revisit this PR on GCC-15 and refine the codes.=