From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 5D5B23858D39; Tue, 14 Mar 2023 07:09:39 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 5D5B23858D39 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1678777779; bh=gsleNVHLdpLoBDtrp220LpuYUWzcb4hkVISdaiG3WDg=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=s0JaT0IsRAC8Uu6hPMR3D05tO1oXEg0oTz2ck33oQHSSLBlIE+YIyE0Nl1tQ3D04i fFNitG1iMToER3om/yVf3erafTdu2qK5JqSkSh5i98vbQ8cKFaOqVeL02UdRH9eTia nhA69JrYrk295Beo69cAPyMIrXj7baQOI6dybw4I= From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/109093] [13 regression] csmith: a February runtime bug ? Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2023 07:09:38 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 13.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: keywords Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D109093 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords|needs-reduction | --- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek --- But we don't really need to dynamically realign anything in this case as th= ere are is nothing on the stack that needs 32-byte alignment, but there is something that needs 16-byte alignment and so the frame size needs to be a multiple of 16 like it is if there would be a call.=